Archive for the ‘Labour Leadership’ Category

Why hasn’t Jack Dromey resigned?

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

One of the players in “Cash for Peerages scandal” was a certain Jack Dromey. He thought it would be helpful to appear in a TV studio and ‘sing like a canary’ about how he had no knowledge of the loans despite being the Treasurer of the Labour Party. He was so indignant I thought he was going to burst a blood vessel.

I couldn’t understand his motive for so publicly airing his grievances on the inner workings of the Labour Party other than to undermine Tony Blair and hasten his departure.

A few years on, there was found to be no scandal and regrettably Tony Blair has moved on and Jack Dromey is still the Labour Party Treasurer.

I am looking forward to seeing an appearance on the news by the Labour Party Treasurer telling us what he knew of the latest donations. Was he aware of them or not? Also was he aware of the donation received by the winner of the Deputy Leadership contest? The problem for Mr Harriet Harman is that this time he can’t credibly play the “I was kept in the dark” card.

Memo to Brown

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

Listening to you floundering in defence of the latest cock ups under your leadership, some observations:

You need to get a grip on that stutter under pressure. It makes you sound evasive and nervous. You don’t want the tabloids to start referring to you as Arkwright of Open All Hours fame.

Stop trying to tell us what we think. You have developed what you believe is a clever phrase to use as your shield (now you can no longer hide behind Tony) – “I think people will (+ verb)”. The trouble is that you have over used it and it lacks effect. Worse still people could infer the phrase as your own distress signal, like the “I’m going not to take any lessons……” line you use at PMQs when you get rattled.

How a prime minister leaves the job, BBC style

Wednesday, June 27th, 2007

It is on the big set piece occasions you can rely on the BBC…..to go overboard with a lot spin, hot air and very little substance. I will comment later on Nick Robinson’s having finally lost the plot. Hopefully he will have had a lie down before he is sick.

The Pontrieux Report is drawn to a “Magazine” article on the BBC news website “How does a prime minister leave the job?”

For the benefit of any students foolish enough to cite this article in any coursework, I offer some corrections;

“Some PMs have dined with the Queen on their last night in office, but it is thought Mr Blair will not be doing this.”

Presumably only those who have known that it was their last night in office. Most PMs have departed as the result of a General Election, so their last night in office was probably spent in their constituency.

“From there he will be carried in the limousine for the last time to Buckingham Palace to see the Queen to resign his post and hand back the seals of office.”

No seals of office changed hands.

“He then leaves the palace in a different car, not the prime ministerial limousine.”

Well it may not the “prime ministerial limousine”, but it looked like the very same car to me.

“As soon as he has left, Mr Brown and his wife, Sarah, will be summoned to the palace to be invited by her majesty to form the next government.”

Actually only Mr Brown was invited to form a government.

“He will be presented with the seals of office.”

No he wasn’t.

“Afterwards the couple return to Downing Street in the limousine left behind by Mr Blair.

Mr Blair didn’t live a limousine behind.

Good old BBC, it’s the way they’re funded you know.

Snatching hope from the jaws of despair

Monday, June 25th, 2007

Watching the deputy leadership results unfold was a depressing experience. If Hazel wasn’t going to win it at least my second choice Alan Johnson was predicted to win by Sky and the BBC . Alas my fifth choice got the job. During Gordon’s speech I thought it was a little bit off for him to publicly sack Hazel and give Harriet her job. I was surprised by the number of colleagues who fell for the “it has to be a woman” line – it wasn’t deemed important last time round. The trots on Labour Home  were gleefully gloating over Hazel’s result, combining vindictiveness towards Hazel with predictions of the demise of New Labour. So I was quite depressed.

But hang on a moment didn’t Gordon mention New Labour twice in his speech? And what was that appearing on the screen after his speech, yes New Labour was back.

On reflection it became clear that giving Harriet the role of party chairman was a master stroke. He has effectively made her minister for the Today programme and  Question Time, having to defend all those things she rubbished during her campaign. I look forward to hearing her defending the Trident decision. Talk about being hoisted by your own petard! Also what one give one can take away, so if she isn’t up to the job Gordon can still move her.

Has Benn blown it with a lacklustre campaign?

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

In between rushing out my plats du jour and trying not to burn the toasted sandwiches I have finally got round to casting my votes in the Labour Deputy Leadership election.  Here is your exclusive Pontrieux Report guide to how my votes were finally cast, with the position of the candidates in brackets before the Newsnight debate. (more…)

Silence is Gordon

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Perhaps the only thing I am “looking forward to” about the Brown premiership is that he will be no longer able to hide away when the going gets tough. I think that having to appear at PMQs will be quite a shock to the system. I fear he will resort to his usual steamroller performance he gives at Select Committees. This may get him through the first few weeks, but a weekly  diatribe of baffling statistics and incomprehensible rhetoric and platitudes will make him look evasive.

One subject on which Gordon has been particularly reticent is his preferred choice of Deputy Leader. As a party  member I would like to know who he feels would be the best choice for the Labour Party. I personally feel that it would be a disaster if Jon Cruddas were elected (in spite of the enthusiastic support of the man off the telly). Would Gordon welcome a deputy with a contrasting vision for the party? Is he hoping that Harriet Harwoman gets the job? Plenty of MPs, Unions, CLPs and individual members (including that man off the telly) have publicly pledged their support for one of the candidates.

Why the silence Gordon? Perhaps he is afraid that we vote in someone other than his preferred candidate and that he looks a bit silly? Or perhaps he has been too busy working out which of our political opponents he wants to join his government?

Glasnost Gordon?

Saturday, May 12th, 2007

Despite Tony Blair’s generous endorsment, it only took a few hours for Gordon Brown to start making veiled attack’s on Tony Blair’s style of Government.

For the past ten years Gordon has had ample opportunity to have run the Treasury as a model for openess, with respect for Parliament. Yet he hasn’t. His own respect for Parliament has been to appear at debates and committees and blitzkrieg with a barrage of unfathomable statistics, often irrelevant to the question asked.

Where will Gordon draw inspiration for his new found glasnost?

Kinnock joins the anti-democrats?

Wednesday, April 18th, 2007

So Neil (sorry Lord) Kinnock has spoken out against Charles Clarke for encouraging a heavyweight contender to Gordon Brown for the leadership of the Labour Party. I really can’t understand how we have come to position where it is considered heresy to want a proper open contest for the leadership. I can’t understand why Minister after Minister trots out to speak on behalf of Gordon and to warn against any challenge. Have they all become so inept at politics that they fail to see how this is playing out across the country?

Before I moved to France  last year, I was chair of Thornbury and Severn Vale Labour Party. We often discussed the leadership and I can tell you while there were distinct pro and anti Blair camps, there was no great enthusiasm for Gordon Brown as leader. Some of the most vocal critics were our older members who felt that he had done little for pensioners, others felt that being Prime Minister was quantum leap from being Chancellor and being good at one didn’t necessarily mean being good at the other. My contribution (and a rare personal criticism of the Prime Minister) is that he had been too cautious with his reshuffles and had been too slow promoting newer younger talent. (And yes before his bandwagon began rolling I did cite David Miliband as an example).

It is commonly said that the reason for the sickening fawning and genuflection towards Brown is to ensure continuity of employment in their existing cabinet role. I offer an alternative hypothesis; the Labour machine have realised that the game is finally up, the British people have become bored with Labour and have no interest in what Labour has to say and that we are definitely going down at the next election. With this knowledge they feel duty bound to allow Gordon his place in the sun, if only for a few years. Despite what he may say, Brown will step down and then we can have our proper debate about the leadership and direction of the party. Not now,  but in two year’s time.  So that’s why Neil Kinnock is telling Charles Clarke to shut up.

Clarke get’s taken Short?

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2007

You have to wonder what Charles Clarke sees when he looks in the mirror. (more…)